Last
December 15, 2006, the UP Administration confirmed what many of us had feared
all along: a TFI proposal that is unpopular, unscientific, and unethical, would
be railroaded. It is unpopular because it has virtually no approval from us
students. At best, the TFI proposal has the support from a handful of students:
the usual gang of people whose idea of improving UP is by installing liquid
soap dispensers in the toilets. It is unscientific because most of its
justifications are based on the false assumption that the economic standing of
the average Filipino today is the same as it was in 2004. With E-VAT, continued
inflation, and a wage increase which isn’t enough for our commuting expenses,
it does not take us a lot of economic jargon to discern how ridiculously false
that assumption is. It is unethical because it is unscientific. Engineers and
scientists would be very familiar with this: Garbage In, Garbage Out. With the
UP Admin using garbage-quality research, it is inevitable that a
garbage-quality TFI proposal would come out. And it is even more unethical
because the UP Admin has deceived the teachers to get their support for the
TFI. Before November 23, the UP Admin promised the teachers that they would get
salary increases once the TFI is approved. Even though they knew it was not
possible under the Salary Standardization Law, the UP Admin continued its lying
until it was exposed. And finally, it is unethical in the way it was passed.
The UP Admin convened the BOR Meeting in another location, the College of Law, and informed the Student and Faculty Regents in a way that they would only be
involved in the voting process. No participation in debates. In fact, there was
no debate as it took the Board of Regents only 20 minutes to finish the entire
meeting, including the approval of the BOR.
Apparently,
this issue did not concern the Law Student Government as it did not bother to
comment or release a statement about it. However, when the LSG did release a
statement, it was in condemnation of the protest action against the TFI, not
the TFI itself. In its statement, the LSG condemned the protest as
“criminal” because it “tramples on propriety, ethics
and any notion of reason”. Yet, the same LSG did not even comment on how the UP
Admin has trampled on propriety, when the BOR convened like a meeting of
thieves, to prevent the Student and Faculty Regents from presenting their
arguments and the students’ outrage. The same LSG did not even comment on how
the UP Admin has trampled on ethics by lying to garner support for the TFI. And
finally, the same LSG did not even comment on how the UP Admin has trampled on
reason, by using obsolete data to justify the TFI.
If
the LSG is really consistent in its “bias” for “propriety, ethics and any
notion of reason”, it should have included the TFI proposal and the conduct of
the BOR Meeting as targets of its criticism. Yet up to this day, the LSG has
not released a statement on both topics. Could it be that the LSG has simply
made a mistake in its analysis by not viewing the protest action in the context
of the outrageous behavior of the BOR? Or could it be that the LSG did not (and
will not) condemn the TFI, and how it was railroaded, because it supports the
TFI? If it is the first option, then the members of the LSG must rethink their
stance before they embarrass their fellow Law students and fellow UP students.
If it is the second option, then we ask the LSG to desist from being the
Admin’s puppets that divert the public’s attention from the outrageous and
unethical TFI.
If
the LSG is really sincere, it should realize this: united we stand, divided we
fall. The UP Admin has already gained a few victories due to its attempts
to divide us students. The battle against TFI is not yet lost, but it will
certainly be, if we continue to remain divided.
And
finally, the LSG, as well the entire UP Community, should be reminded of the
fable about trees. When the “better” trees allowed the “lower” trees to be cut
down, the “lower” trees were used as handles for the woodcutters’ axes,
allowing them to chop down the entire forest.
Will
they let their fellow UP students be “chopped down”?